Site icon Healthy.net

Early Alzheimer’s Disease: Recognition and Assessment. :Guideline Overview No. 19

Background

Dementia is a syndrome in which progressive deterioration in
intellectual abilities is so severe
that it interferes with the person’s usual social and
occupational functioning. An estimated 5 to
10 percent of the U.S. adult population ages 65 and older is
affected by a dementing disorder,
and the incidence doubles every 5 years among people in this age
group.

Alzheimer’s disease is the most common form of dementia in the
United States. It and related
dementias affect at least 2 million, and possibly as many as 4
million, U.S. residents. Despite its
prevalence, dementia often goes unrecognized or is misdiagnosed
in its early stages. Many
health care professionals, as well as patients and family
members, mistakenly view the early
symptoms of dementia as inevitable consequences of aging.

Some disorders that result in dementia are “reversible or
potentially reversible,” which means
that they can be treated effectively to restore normal or nearly
normal intellectual function.
Among the most frequent reversible causes of dementia are
depression, alcohol abuse, and drug
toxicity. In elderly persons, drug use—particularly drug
interactions caused by
“polypharmacy” (simultaneous use of multiple drugs)—is a
common cause of cognitive
decline. Depression also is an underdiagnosed condition in this
population.

The majority of dementias, including Alzheimer’s disease, are
considered nonreversible. Even
for these conditions, correct diagnosis of the problem in its
early stages can be beneficial.
Correct recognition can prevent costly and inappropriate
treatment resulting from misdiagnosis,
and give patients and families time to prepare for the
challenging financial, legal, and medical
decisions that may lie ahead. In addition, many of the
nonreversible dementias such as
Alzheimer’s disease include symptoms that can be treated
effectively (for example, incontinence,
wandering, depression).

According to the National Institute on Aging, an estimated $90
billion is spent annually for
Alzheimer’s disease alone, and the noneconomic toll is
incalculable. Although State and local
governments and the Federal Government bear some of the economic
burden, largely through
Medicare and Medicaid, a substantial proportion is borne by
families that provide unpaid care.
Changes caused by dementia may advance relentlessly over many
years, creating not only deep
emotional and psychological distress but practical problems
related to caregiving that can
overwhelm affected families.

Addressing the Problem

In 1992, the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, a
Federal Government agency within
the Public Health Service, convened a panel of private-sector
experts to develop a clinical
practice guideline on screening for Alzheimer’s disease and
related dementias. This topic was
selected because:

After extensive literature searches and meta-analyses, the panel
decided to focus on early
detection of dementia in persons exhibiting certain
characteristics or triggers that signal the need
for further assessment, rather than recommend general screening
of segments of the population,
such as those over a certain age. The panel made this decision
after concluding that:

The panel subsequently limited its scope specifically to the
subject of recognition and initial
assessment and therefore did not address differential diagnosis,
management, or treatment issues
after diagnosis.

Principal Objective

The panel’s principal objective was to increase the likelihood of
early recognition and assessment
of a potential dementing illness so that (1) concern can be
eliminated if it is not warranted; (2)
treatable conditions can be identified and addressed
appropriately; and (3) nonreversible
conditions can be diagnosed early enough to permit the patient
and family to plan for
contingencies such as long-term care.

Specifically, the panel’s goals were to:

Findings

The panel’s major findings include:

In asymptomatic persons who have possible risk factors (e.g.,
family history and Down
syndrome for Alzheimer’s disease), the clinician’s judgment and
knowledge of the patient’s
current condition, history, and social situation (living
arrangements, support services, isolation)
should guide the decision to initiate an assessment for
dementia.

Initiating an Assessment

For a diagnosis of dementia, current criteria in the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), require evidence of decline
from previous levels of
functioning and impairment in multiple cognitive domains, not
solely memory. Because
evidence of decline in previous abilities is critical in
establishing dementia, a personal
knowledge of the patient is invaluable to the clinician in
assessing symptoms and interpreting
results of an initial assessment for dementia.

A focused history is critical in the assessment for dementia. It
is particularly important to
establish the symptoms’ mode of onset (abrupt versus gradual);
progression (stepwise versus
continuous decline; worsening versus fluctuating versus
improving), and duration.

A focused physical examination, including a brief neurological
evaluation, is an essential
component of the initial assessment. Special attention should be
placed on assessing for those
conditions that cause delirium, since delirium represents a
medical emergency. During the
focused physical examination, health care providers should be
alert to signs of abuse and neglect
of patients by caregivers and report suspected abuse to the
proper authorities.

Informant reports (information obtained from family members or
caregivers) can supplement
information from patients who have experienced memory loss and
may lack insight into the
severity of their decline. Health care providers, however, should
consider the possibility of
questionable motives of informant reports, which may exaggerate,
minimize, or deny symptoms.

Brief mental status tests can be used but they are not
diagnostic. They are used to (1) develop a
multidimensional clinical picture; (2) provide a baseline for
monitoring the course of cognitive
impairment over time; (3) reassess mental status in persons who
have treatable delirium or
depression on initial evaluation; and (4) document multiple
cognitive impairments as required
for a diagnosis of dementia.

Assessing for Depression

Depression can be difficult to distinguish from dementia, and it
can coexist with dementia.
Changes in memory, attention, and the ability to make and carry
out plans suggest depression,
the most common psychiatric illness in older persons. Marked
visuospatial or language
impairment suggests a dementing process. The clinical interview
is the mainstay for evaluating
and diagnosing depression in older adults. Two self-report
instruments with established
reliability and validity are the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)
and the Center for
Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D).

Interpreting Findings

Three results are possible from the combination of findings from
assessments of mental and
functional status: (1) normal, (2) abnormal, and (3) mixed.

When results of both mental and functional status tests are
normal and there are no other clinical
concerns, reassurance and suggested reassessment in 6 to 12
months are appropriate. If concerns
persist, referral for a second opinion or further clinical
evaluation should be considered.

When both mental and functional status tests yield findings of
abnormality, further clinical
evaluation should be conducted. However, a laboratory test should
not be used as a screening
procedure or part of an initial assessment. Laboratory tests
should be conducted only after (1) it
has been confirmed that the patient has impairment in multiple
domains that is not lifelong and
represents a decline from previous levels of functioning; (2)
delirium and depression have been
excluded; (3) confounding factors such as educational level have
been considered; and (4)
medical conditions have been be ruled out.

Mixed results—abnormal findings on the mental status test
with no abnormalities in
functional assessment or vice versa—call for further
evaluation. For example:

The Role of Neuropsychological Testing

Neuropsychological tests can examine performance across different
domains of cognition. This
broad battery of tests can help in identifying dementia among
persons with high premorbid
intellectual functioning, discriminating patients with a
dementing illness from those with focal
cerebral disease, and differentiating among certain causes of
dementia.

The Importance of Followup

Followup, with assessment of declining mental function, may be
the most useful diagnostic
procedure for differentiating Alzheimer’s disease from normal
aging. For this reason, the mental
status test should be repeated over a period of 6 to 12 months.
In cases of referral, it is important
to make sure that test results and medical records follow the
patient from the specialist back to
the referring clinician.

Key Points About Alzheimer’s Disease

Key Points About Alzheimer’s Disease

For Patients

Symptoms That Might Indicate Dementia

Does the person have increased difficulty with any of the
activities listed below? Positive
findings in any of these areas generally indicate the need for
further assessment for the presence
of dementia.

Guideline Development

The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research convened an
18-member private-sector,
interdisciplinary panel composed of psychologists, psychiatrists,
neurologists, an internist,
geriatricians, nurses, a social worker, and consumer
representatives. The panel conducted
extensive literature searches to identify empirical studies of
assessment of mental status
instruments for differentiating persons with and without dementia
and instruments used in the
assessment of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. It conducted
additional literature searches
related to assessment of functional impairment and risk factors
for dementia and conducted
meta-analyses. The panel also held a public hearing to give
interested organizations, individuals,
and agencies an opportunity to present oral or written testimony
for the panel’s consideration.

The results of the literature reviews and meta-analyses were used
to develop a draft guideline.
Copies were distributed for two peer review cycles. Reviewers
were selected to represent a broad
range of disciplines and clinical practice areas. A total of 109
reviewers submitted comments,
which were collated and reviewed by the panel co-chairs and used
to develop the final guideline.


Current Availability

You can now obtain copies of the Consumer Version free
through InstantFAX, which operates
all day every day. Using a fax machine equipped with a touch tone
telephone, dial (301)
594-2800, push 0 and follow the voice prompts. The code for the
publication is 967123.


Future Availability

Additional guideline information will be available later this
year (Winter 1996) in several forms:

To obtain further information on the availability of the Quick
Reference Guide
or Consumer
Version
, call the AHCPR Publications Clearinghouse at (800)
358-9295 or write to:

Alzheimer’s Disease
AHCPR Publications Clearinghouse
P.O. Box 8547
Silver Spring, MD 20907-8547

Single and bulk copies of the Clinical Practice Guideline,
Recognition and Initial Assessment of
Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias,
may be purchased,
when available, from the U.S.
Government Printing Office by calling (202) 512-1800.

The Clinical Practice Guideline, Quick Reference Guide, and
Consumer Version
will also be
available on the Internet through the AHCPR Home Page. You can
access the guideline products
by using a Web browser, specifying the URL http://www.ahcpr.gov/guide, and clicking on
Clinical Practice Guidelines Online.

AHCPR, a part of the U.S. Public Health Service, is the lead
agency charged with supporting
research designed to improve the quality of health care, reduce
its costs, and broaden access to
essential services.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Public Health Service
Agency for Health Care Policy and Research
2101 East Jefferson Street, Suite 501
Rockville, MD 20852

AHCPR Publication No. 97-R123
September 1996


Exit mobile version